Review: Jailbreaking the Goddess
Jailbreaking the Goddess: A Radical Revisioning of Feminist Spirituality by Lasara Firefox Allen (Llewellyn Publications, 2016), 7.4” x 9.1” trade paperback, 288 pages. Also available as an ebook.
In the second chapter titled, “More Than Our
Biology,” the author explains in depth the problems she sees with the Triple
Goddess concept including its exclusion of factors outside of reproduction.
This, she writes, leads to a woman’s “basic worth” being “based in utility....or usefulness, her body is a commodity”; this prevents her from having “full
self-determination.” She also sees it as excluding women who can’t or don’t
want to have children, women who cannot have menstrual periods, and women born
without uteri. She suggests that women’s bodies have been “colonized” by the
dominant culture, delves into the ways that various groups—including racial,
ethnic, and “trans”—have been colonized more or differently from others, and
suggests ways to counter the dominant culture’s definition of woman as
biologically-determined. She also discusses non-binary gender identity and the
role of women’s use of language in various cultures
Firefox Allen describes herself as “a white woman” who
acknowledges her “position and privilege,” and is dedicated to “the concept and
practice of intersectional feminism.” She writes that in this book she is
“making it up” as she goes along, and invites readers to do the same and not to
necessarily accept or follow what she proposes. The bio on the inner flap of the
book’s back cover describes her as a “family traditions Witch and second
generation ordained Pagan priestess.”
She notes that she will be using some words that
readers may not be used to, such as “feminal” (which I like— she frequently uses
it where others might use “feminine” and sometimes “female”). She apparently
has resurrected this word, as the Oxford dictionary defines it as archaic. Also noting that she uses the word “archetypes,” but not in the usual
Jungian way, she proposes that the Maiden/Mother/Crone trinity be replaced by five “faces” or aspects of the Goddess
with Latin names. Taking the definitions from the inside flap of the front
cover, these are :
--Femella: “girl. . . .the primal child, the
divine child--Potens: “able, patent, might, strong, powerful…the woman of strength, full of potential and power, bursting forth.”
--Creatrix: “female creator….the mother, the maker, the author.”
--Sapientia: “wisdom, discernment, intellect, a science….Master of her craft, teacher, leader, woman of science & art.”
--Antiqua: “Ancient, aged, time honored, venerable, traditional, essential….the old woman, the dreamer, the storyteller, the witch at the gate.”
The author greatly expands on these inside the book,
devoting a chapter to each new face. She suggests that these aspects are not
necessarily connected to age, but can also be connected to the stage we find
ourselves in our lives—and that we may inhabit more than one face at a time,
depending on the circumstances.
The chapters for each of her five proposed new faces of the Goddess begin with the “sigil” (magical symbol) and beautifully written poetic prose description of that particular aspect. They end with a poem/invocation to that aspect. Some of the material within these chapters include descriptions of the aspect in her “Occult” and “Empowered” (words she uses because she dislikes the racial implications of “dark” and “light” [as do I]) appearances, sexuality, stages of womanhood not necessarily linked to biology, deities from a wide variety of cultures that may be related to this particular face, attributes, relationship to elements, animals, plants, weather, seasons in both global hemispheres, holidays whose sources may be religious/spiritual or secular, and suggestions for rites, rituals and observances.
And all this is just in Part 1 of the book, which
ends with a short chapter, “ Rewilding: the Path from Here.’’ This chapter acts
as a transition to Part 2, which discusses “relationality, liberation,
collectivism, self-reflection, and magick.” Its first chapter (chapter 9 of the
book) discusses philosophical and ethical concerns of “The Relational”
including collective liberation and personal responsibility. This chapter also
discusses why “Intention is Not Everything,” revolving around the question of
whether we are able—or even would want to—create our own reality. In the
section immediately following this, Foxfire Allen writes: “We cannot live in
the ‘believe it, and it shall be so’ and ‘everything happens for a reason’
bubble without casting blame on those whose cultures are being constricted,
starved, contaminated instead of looking at the real perpetrators of the
desecration.” Among the topics also discussed in Part 2 are “decolonizing our
magicks” and the shortcomings of “White Feminism’; “Decentralizing Your Working
Group” including examining and changing group power structures; being drawn to
specific deities and spirit possession; and information and advice on creating
rites of passage and other rituals. The book also includes two Forewords, one
by Ariel Gore and another by Rosa De Anda, and an appendix with “Magical and
Ritual Considerations for a New Practitioner.”
It seems to me that Jailbreaking the Goddess can be considered part of a trend in the
last decade or so of books and teachers presenting alternatives to what was/is
assumed to be ancient Goddess practice but at least some of which, like the triple
Goddess concept, can presently be traced only as far back as the early 20th
century. Examples of relatively new ideas and alternatives include Carol
Christ’s She Who Changes (2003), which
seeks to combine Goddess religion with process theology; Glenys Livingstone’s PaGaian Cosmology (2005), which combines
the Maiden/Mother/Crone “female metaphor” with current scientific theory; and The Queen
of Myself (2o04) by Donna Henes, whose proposal that “Queen” be added
between Mother and Crone has been adopted in the
teachings of Rev. Ava of The Goddess Temple of Orange County.
What can also be considered another part of this trend is people creating
alternatives in other religions, such as the 13 priestess paths related to both
the understanding of the female divine and human or legendary women in
[Rabbi] Jill Hammer and Taya Shere's The
Hebrew Priestess (2015) and drawn from their work as leaders of the Kohenet
Hebrew Priestess Institute.
Speaking of updating, I want to mention the use of
the term “jailbreaking” in this book’s title, as well as another incident that
I’ll get to shortly. When I first saw “Jailbreaking” in the title,I was a bit
startled. I showed the book cover to two other people. One had a little familiarity with
Goddess spirituality and the other had none. Both people had the similar
reactions to mine (I didn’t tell them mine until after they told me theirs),
which went something like “Why does the Goddess need to be broken out of jail?”
“What did she do wrong that caused her to be imprisoned?” “If we help her break
out of jail, aren’t we also doing something illegal?” Of course the Goddess
hasn’t done anything wrong and neither have we. But that seems to be a gut
response for some people. So I thought about it, knowing at that time only a
bit about what was inside the book. I decided that what the title really
meant was something like freeing the Goddess or liberating
the Goddess. And I had another thought: Maybe there was another meaning for
jailbreaking. I think I
favor this iPod/iPad/iPhone-related definition as a metaphor for breaking out
of limitations in general because there is less confusion about meaning. The
second incident also seems techie-related. In Chapter 14, “Ritual Elements and
Templates,” in a section of templates for “Rituals of Invocation and Rituals of Initiation,” there is discussion of guided visualizations.
But sometimes (at least in
the copy the publisher sent me) the word is spelled "vizualizations" in the
heading and "visualizations" in the text (often directly under the heading
spelling). What’s going on here, I wondered and headed over to Google again.
And guess what! There is a spelling with the 2 z’s and it’s apparently related
to technology,
possibly adopted from street slang, “Vizual.”
So I have to wonder, was this a magickal
manifestation of the contemporary Goddess Computa?
Before leaving this review I want to mention that throughout
the book, as part of each section (yet set apart typographically), the author
gives suggestions for journaling topics and subjects for action (voluntary, of course).
This increases the book’s usefulness not only for individuals, but also for use
in groups and classes.
I also
want to note – as the author herself recognizes in several places – that not
everyone will agree with some of the ideas nor want to adopt some of practices discussed
in this book. (For example, I am not comfortable with the idea of me practicing
spirit possession though I have observed it on a few occasions and understand and
respect it as part of a number of cultures’ practices.) That we might not agree
with everything in the book doesn’t detract from its value – in fact, may
increase its value – as Firefox Allen offers a vast array of different ideas/practices and
encourages readers to adopt or develop whichever they wish.
Jailbreaking the Goddess is a scholarly,
spiritual, poetic book. Theoretical and practical and inspirational, it is beautifully
structured and beautifully written – a welcome contribution to the growth of
feminist/Goddess spirituality at this time of evolution and expansion in these
living religions.
Labels: books, Goddess traditions, Pagan issues, reviews, rituals
4 Comments:
Thank you so much for taking the time to read and review Jailbreaking the Goddess. I'm glad it affected you positively.
I am sure the spelling of visualization was cleared up by the final copy. :) I wish I could send out the final copy as an ebook but that isn't possible.
Thanks again for the review.
Blessings of love and power,
-Lasara
Thank you Judith for this review, and for mentioning PaGaian Cosmology as one of the new Goddess practices. I would like to refute the claim that the triple Goddess concept is rooted in patriarchy, and that it origins are traced to Freud and Graves. Maria Gimbutas notes its ancient roots (p.97 The Language of the Goddess) and Durdin-Robertson, Erich Neumann and Adele Getty have images of trinitarian Goddesses from early in the millennium. Their qualities vary, but the are triple Goddesses. Michael Dames points out that one of the valencies of the Triple Spiral of Newgrange (2400 B.C.E.) is a triple Goddess of that place - Eiru, Fodla and Banba. Freud and Graves had a particular reduced take on the ubiquitous Triplicity: I am sure they had little understanding of it, reducing it as they did, exclusively to the human female's menstrual transitions. To throw out the "triple Goddess concept" is to throw the baby out with the bath water.
Yet in regard "we are more than our biology": My understanding of biology is that it is inseparable from consciousness/spirit/mind ... we are matter, which imo is "bio-spiritual" - there is no separation; and add to that the understanding that the triplicity of old is innate to Cosmic creativity ... evident in all body cycles like breathing and eating, but which unfolds at all levels of reality (waxing, peaking and waning basically, but with much more complexity in most cases) - female menstrual transitions is just a small slice of the pie. The limitation of it to that may well be useful to the patriarchy - but my sources have never been Freud and Graves. There are plenty of Goddess scholars whose research takes us deeper - with more knowledge of this Earth and place of being. And as you know, I add science to that.
The naming of 5 stages of modern women's lives is something quite different from Cosmic Creativity: to my mind it is more like Psychosynthesis. Psychosynthesis is a useful tool, but is not a replacement for the qualities of Cosmogenesis, which is where I position my feminist spirituality. For me, and my work of PaGaian Cosmology, Goddess IS Cosmogenesis ... She is the unfolding Cosmos, and we (like all beings) cannot be separated from that: in that sense we are "our biology" because we are the web of life - inseparable.
In regard the terms "dark" and"light": again it is a patriarchal problem that "dark" has been assigned a negative value. To throw out the terms, and not restore integrity to "dark" - and negative to "light" (as you can if you live in a hot overly sunny place), is to throw the baby out. To know "dark" as fertile Source, and Love itself, would surely be a better strategy.
To my mind then, based on your review, this book keeps Goddess in jail, caught in a dualistic frame.
To Pagaian: about your last paragraph especially--from reading the review, I don't understand your conclusion--reviews can't cover everything in a book!And I don't understand how you ccan criticize a book without reading it first!
Pagaian - I do hope you will read Jailbreaking the Goddess before you toss it in the rubbish heap. :)
Best of luck to you, either way.
-Lasara
Post a Comment
<< Home